New Ways to Detect Lies With Forensics
One of the most challenging tasks for a forensic expert is determining if a person is telling the truth. Over the years, all sorts of testing methods have been introduced – some eventually disregarded while others have become mainstays in Forensic Science.
New Techniques
In the past several years, however, new techniques have been brought forth, many promising to revolutionise the way in which we determine if a person is honest or telling a lie. In fact, a recent claim is that a new test is 97% accurate in finding out if someone is telling lies.Does It Work?
The test has, however, been approached with much scepticism and doubt. The technique is one that monitors the brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Researchers in support of the test claim that it is the gold standard for determining if a person is lying. Those who developed the technique cite that when a person is lying, there is an increase in blood flow to the brain. In turn, oxygen levels in the brain increase.
What The Scan Shows
In terms of what the researcher can see, the scanner shows that areas of the brain essentially brighten when questions are asked. The test was developed in the United States and researchers believe that it's tougher to 'cheat' the fMRI than the traditional polygraph because the fMRI keeps track of changes in the brain, as opposed to the usual stress responses that link up to a lie.The approach to testing is different as well. Rather than bombard the person being tested with a constant barrage of questions, the person receives more segregated questions that are asked in smaller bits. In this way, the brain can basically recover from the last question, allowing it to go back to 'normal'. Then, the next question can provide a result that is more accurate and easier to read.
Bringing The Test To The Market
At present, the lie detector technique is available on a commercial basis in the United States. In fact, the technique has even been utilised by a forensic team investigating a crime. The aim is for the technique to be widely adopted around the United States as well as in Canada and Europe.Unfortunately, there is still some controversy around the test. Queries have been raised about whether or not this test is ethical and there are issues around the level of invasiveness of the test. Its accuracy is also still under question, which means that routinely using it in court may still be a long way off.















Re: Estimating The Time of Death
I am hoping to field some suggestions, not answers, only suggestions on this puzzle. A) A body of a person missing for 24 days…
Re: The Rate of Decay in a Corpse
I just wanted you to know how much I love your site. I'm a crime writer, so this information is gold. Thank you!
Re: Rigor Mortis and Lividity
My husband died 10 June 2016 without my knowledge. The people he was staying with never notified me of the death and by chance on the…
Re: Bodily Fluids in Forensic Science
Thank you Jesse. She found out she was pregnant at a walk in clinic so they won't acknowledge it. Sad all around. If you…
Re: Determining Cause of Death
My child was struck by a car getting on the school bus. The coroner determined that she died immediately at 6:35 am, she was…
Re: Forensic Pathology
If someone is sruck and killed by a car will they do a tox report on the dead
Re: Skeletal Remains
Does forensics use mainly teeth for identification of skeletal remains?
Re: Determining Cause of Death
Brianna Dibattiste went missing from June 16, 2014 . Her partial remains were found beside a pioneer cemetery covered in brush. Some…
Re: Bodily Fluids in Forensic Science
@Dash - this sounds awful - your poor friend. If the pregnancy was early then there would be no trace if the body was…
Re: Hair and Fibres in Forensics
How do i can give more lecture on glass and glass fragment and how do they can examine????